Skip to main content

TL;DR

Chebyshev's Inequality: P(|X - mu| >= k*sigma) <= 1/k^2 — tail bound using mean and variance. This concept is essential for quantitative trading interviews and is frequently tested at top firms.

By Valenke Exam Prep Team·Last updated 2026-06-01
Probability

Chebyshev's Inequality

P(|X - mu| >= k*sigma) <= 1/k^2 — tail bound using mean and variance.

Prerequisites

Chebyshev's inequality tightens Markov by incorporating variance. For any random variable XX with mean μ\mu and variance σ2\sigma^2: P(Xμkσ)1k2P(|X - \mu| \geq k\sigma) \leq \frac{1}{k^2} Equivalently: P(Xμt)σ2t2P(|X - \mu| \geq t) \leq \frac{\sigma^2}{t^2}. Intuition: Markov says "the mean controls the tail." Chebyshev says "the spread controls the tail even better." If a distribution has small variance, most of its mass must be near the mean — Chebyshev quantifies exactly how much. Proof: Apply Markov's inequality to Y=(Xμ)2Y = (X - \mu)^2, which is non-negative. Then P(Xμt)=P(Yt2)E[Y]/t2=σ2/t2P(|X-\mu| \geq t) = P(Y \geq t^2) \leq E[Y]/t^2 = \sigma^2/t^2. Concrete example: An exam has mean score 70 and standard deviation 10. What fraction of students score below 40 or above 100? That's X7030=3σ|X - 70| \geq 30 = 3\sigma. By Chebyshev: P1/911.1%P \leq 19\frac{1}{9} \approx 11.1\%. When to use: Bounding tail probabilities when you know the mean and variance but not the full distribution. Proving concentration results. In interviews, Chebyshev often appears as: "Without assuming normality, bound the probability that..." Alternative approach: If you know the moment generating function, Chernoff bounds are exponentially tighter. Chebyshev is the go-to when you only have two moments.

Ready to practice for the Valenke Finance Exam?

Adaptive practice powered by Item Response Theory targets your weak areas. Start with 3 free sessions.

Start free practice →